Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this a positive or a negative development?
Some people with health issues today rely on alternative medicines instead of going to the hospital. Personally, I believe it is a negative trend because curing one’s self can be a risky decision.
On the positive side, there are some advantages of using alternative medicines. For example, traditional treatments like herbal remedies have been practiced from generations ago. They are reliable, easy to follow, and have no side effects on the human body. Moreover, herbal plants are eco-friendly while pharmaceutical medicines consume chemicals that cause water and gas pollutions. In addition, seasonal and minor illnesses such as cough, sneezing, and headache can be cured by self-treatment if we have some medical knowledge. This practice can be a lot more economical than visiting hospitals as they charge a lot and make us buy expensive drugs.
However, this development also has many flaws. Each pill, capsule, or medical drink obtains complex chemicals and we never know whether a chemical reaction can be fatal or toxic. That is why some people trigger allergic reactions or even worsen their health by curing themselves. Therefore, doctors are the only trustworthy people to consult as they have studied medicine and specialized in the medical field for years. By meeting them, they can give an insight into your disease, make suggestions for your diet or lifestyle and inform you if the surgery is necessary.
To conclude, as I see it, depending on self-treatment is not guaranteed for the safety of one’s health. Since we should simply go to the local clinic or hospital and meet doctors who can point us in the direction.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
2024-09-01 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 78
- The diagrams show how the bee makes honey and the stages in the production of honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing one’s self can be a risky decision. On the positive side, there are some adv...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lot and make us buy expensive drugs. However, this development also has many ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...form you if the surgery is necessary. To conclude, as I see it, depending on s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87194424884 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665413533835 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.920789158 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178844564991 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590000908206 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551953939346 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109474365366 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429098617486 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.