We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is agrued that individuals can not support everyone in the world, so people should be more paid attention with their own communities and countries. From my point of view, at some positions i mostly agree with this notion because its reality in the modern life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of new technology that many citiens have become unemployment and homeless, so communities concerned is hugely significant for the social development. Not only does it help people can be more concerntrate in each pratical individual and appropriate with their finacial background, but also socioeconomic will be narrowed which advance the nation development. Furthermore, protential life of poor individuals can be improved graduately. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Timmer Bacyer, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of europian countries with appopriate plans for their poor individuals. The statistic showed that nearly every nation has got numerous achevement, reducing the percentage of unemployment and homeless people.
On the other hand, we can not negate the importance of concerning everyone in the world for the society growth. However, this problem is also appropriate with millionare such as Bill Gate, Buffet or Jacma. Moreover, a various of government take advantage from this revenue for their own profits, harmful imfluence will be led by this action to the young generations.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally agree with this statement since it apporiate with our positios held and economic background. The state need to have clear plans to improve the social life for the nation development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 56
- In some countries today people are having their first child when they are older What are the reasons for this Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 56
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of unemployment and homeless people. On the other hand, we can not negate the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this action to the young generations. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3309352518 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95371713346 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6210385608 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318612822494 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098317267922 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636072940498 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186497689494 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328305906707 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.