Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
In contemporary settings, there exist divergent opinions regarding the target of all nations. Among those, some people argue that manufacturing more merchandise should be an ideal one. Personally, I am in consummate discord with this viewpoint due to the possibility of economic crisis and poor living standards for citizens.
To commence, it is irrefutable that more created materials and goods will easily put the economy on the brink of being stagnant. To be more specific, this will give rise to a surplus of products, leading supply to overtake demand. Hence, the manufacturing scale will be downsized, increasing the unemployment rate. The rising number of poor people provokes social chaos such as crime or famine, which requires authorities to invest much money to tackle. In other words, overproducing merchandise will have a counterproductive effect and refrain the economy from developing.
More than that, merely focusing on increasing material output means that other aspects of life will be overlooked. The most typical illustration of this is the healthcare and service sector. Regarding the former, public health is greatly risked since food companies solely concentrate on quantity instead of qualitative features. Also, in terms of the latter, just allocating resources to infrastructure can not attract and retain potential customers owing to poor and amateur service provided by untrained staff. As a result, neither citizens nor enterprises can be satisfied in their daily lives.
In summary, generating more commodities will eventually result in an economic recession and unsatisfactory living conditions. Therefore, unless people avoid this inappropriate goal, it will be challenging for society to achieve holistic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | RkmsU | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | sonicmaster | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | VuTungSon | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 84
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 84
- Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69581749049 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13560291926 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680608365019 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7387815161 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161316343002 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050558218985 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533964931578 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947844805937 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227979351434 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.