It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Nowadays, with the significant development of technology, the traditional culture is gradually disappearing. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view, and I believe that technology and traditional cultures can not coexist in the world.
On the one hand, there may be occasions when technology can enhance traditional culture. Firstly, modern equipment can make traditional activities more efficient and yield better results. For example, in Mexico, indigenous communities use eco-friendly technologies to produce honey while preserving their cultural customs. Similarly, film-making offers an excellent opportunity for people to explore cultures from all over the globe while remaining entertaining.
On the other hand, the rapid advancement of technology continues to erode traditional ways of life worldwide. With access to smartphones and computers becoming more prevalent among young people in rural areas, some team sports or unique cultural practices lose attention as younger generations prefer digital activities instead of building on their traditions. Every day, we find it easy to see that most children, even though they are five years old, can use smartphones or computers to play games or chat with their friends, so they rarely spend their time exploring their culture. Furthermore, nowadays, fewer people are interested in traditional skills such as pottery-making because modern machines can perform those tasks in a short period.
In conclusion, while there may be occasions when technology and traditional culture can work together side by side for mutual benefit discovering each other, its steady process signifies a significant loss for many societies' cultures globally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the number of international applicants from four countries that a European university had from 2004 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.796812749 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06706672624 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9858305569 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.272727273 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299922056125 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128863517032 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978692659002 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21813400799 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116684797969 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.