over packaging products avoid consumer
The consumer should avoid over packed products which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. In my opinion, the former preposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate on the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the over packaging products will increase the demand which put burdens on consumers pocket. Moreover, the use of more paper will also lead to deforestation and plastic waste and also this material used for other purposes. Needless to say, all these demerits stand in bad stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument but one of the crucial effects is that it will also increase the demand for the good. Furthermore, the over packaging products is wastage of manpower and material and also the transportation costs are the rise and also decrease the space of products.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion the drawbacks of over packaging products are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | Aruna Matta | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | karan Kunal | 77 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | view | |
| 2020-03-11 | gurlal sandhu | 77 | view |
- Problem and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago 85
- whether design building 61
- over packaging products avoid consumer 77
- Extreme sports like skiing water rafting etc are dangerous and should these be banned 77
- Television is an essential part of life 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76736047953 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.705423773 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262823872381 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090639843017 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111423293721 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153663735109 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121994743849 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.