Schools should prepare students for university. rather than for work,'
How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
We all know that knowledge is a wealth that cannot be stolen. Nowadays some people believe that school education must be theoretical while others believe that school education must be practical. I also agree with this statement in to some extend and here I’m going to discuss my views.
To begin with theoretical knowledge such as science, mathematics, history etc.is very important for any student as it is the foundation for secondary education. Now further education like a degree or a diploma is also essential in order to get a good job. Hence, do some changes in school syllabus by aiming universities is good but it is not the only thing that matters to have white collar jobs. Furthermore, in most interviews employees are looking for candidates who have practical knowledge rather than a 1st class in university. So that, engage in sports, music or art activities at school is an extra qualification and surely will add points in job interviews.
In addition, with the high competition in modern world school should not prepare students only for work also. Why I’m saying like that is because, all most all the students are now interested in not only to have a degree but also to complete masters or Phds. So that, if any one stops his education after schools and get ready for a job, he may not able to find his dream job. With compared to other candidates in the pool he may not having enough education qualifications for that job.
To conclude, I think that school education should not be one sided. It is the responsibility of schools to prepare students with both book knowledge and practical qualifications such as team working, respect others, accept both victory and defeat etc. Hence, school syllabus should be change according to that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | coolguy | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | msgnaneswaran | 69 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | amritpal223 | 22 | view |
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 55
- What are the pros and cons of staying connected on social media for 24 hours a day. 64
- The space travel is excellent these day, but there are many environmental problems in our planet we should tackle the problems but not travel space and spend a lot of money. Discuss this opinion. 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts. What is your opinion? 69
- Environmental problems are too serious for individuals to solve and only big companies/governments can solve them. Do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...so agree with this statement in to some extend and here I'm going to discuss my v...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ould not prepare students only for work also. Why I'm saying like that is becau...
^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: ALL_MOST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'almost'?
Suggestion: almost
...y I'm saying like that is because, all most all the students are now interested in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...o complete masters or Phds. So that, if any one stops his education after schools and g...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...t etc. Hence, school syllabus should be change according to that.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, second, so, while, i think, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92666666667 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75994363872 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7227596296 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236453532852 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081396689575 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657486809081 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141220980873 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301903571662 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.