Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of advertisements in schools and its cooresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that educational purposes is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that promotion can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, funding by sponsers can provide the society with some noticeable rffects which are rooted in the fact that banners, as well as rising awareness, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered money supporting. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both funding and cooperation apparently can be seen.
Within the psychological science, exploiting children might increase the consequences of treating pupils. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of susceptable students relate to this reality that the demerits of agressive attitudes pertain to abusing them. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asseted that the downside of violence is correlated negatively with advertising tricking. Hence, it is correct to presume the precoceived notion of captive audience.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of providing great resources for education far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the adavantages of advertisement prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint corporate sponsers implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- Should age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 88
- my template 11
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Should age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 55
- Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89451476793 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37176478056 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713080168776 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.767029895 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13557978339 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392395455665 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305625816847 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679270867565 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231210243774 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.44 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.