The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The first pie chart depicts how much money a children’s charity earned from six different sources in the USA, whereas the other chart represents the amount of spending allocated for three distinct ways. In highlight, most income was received from donated food while almost all expenditures were to operate program service.
Firstly, it is true that the charity earned 86.6% of whole income ($53,561,580) from the donation of food. Differently, another source from community merely contributed approximately one-tenth the sum, followed by 2.2% from charity event. Meanwhile, the incomes from the three other sources consisting of other income, investment and government grants ranged from below 0.4% to 0.2%. Secondly, from $53,224,896 of whole amount of expenditure, the charity organization funded the program spending almost all this amount for service, while fund-raising event and the official merely cost money count on 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively.
In conclusion, it is clear that by calculating total income and expenditure, the charity organisation for children still had approximately $330,000 of unspent money.
- It is believed that art such as poetry, music, painting and so on could be produced by any one. Others think differently saying that it acquires special abilities for a person to create art.Discuss both views and reach a conclusion from your own perspecti 78
- The use of violence in music lyrics video games and films seen by children is causing concern in many societies What problems this type of violent imagery may cause and what steps could be taken to lessen the impact on young people 79
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countries between 1990 and 1999. 78
- Some people believe that a person s intelligence is inherited from the parents while others believe that their environment is the main factor Discuss these views Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence 70
- There shall be benefits for society if all advertisement forms are completely banned.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92624762624 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6471776603 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 5.23603664747 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214859883461 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944024346154 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819103096201 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151692517426 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646543597271 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.