The government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a growing trend to see the colossal upsurge in government allocating a significant proportion of the nation’s budget for the cultural sectors like arts, music, and painting. Some academics believe that it would lead to some concerns which would prove to be deleterious for the growth of the country, whereas rest advocates otherwise. My viewpoints co-insides with the letter group of people.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that these various forms of creative activities are vital for the cultural and economic growth of the nation and thus government should take an active interest in developing these areas by providing financial support. Not only music and colors proffer the individuals the aura to relax and have a peace of mind, but it also let the people express their emotions and cultures at national and international level. It hardly needs mention that these merits stand the country in the good stead as far as development is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that art has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the country and hence negligence from the government would lead to loss of rich cultural diversity. Moreover, these expressive subjects boost the creativity in the people and such creative citizens will make country shine across the globe with their talents. Moving further on the same track, civilians have a right to choose any form of art to thrive and it’s a duty of the respected government to provide the liberty to do so.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned arguments it can be concluded that advantages of investing in art, music, and paintings are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | elise1234 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | shyamsingh08 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | sajid.uett | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | Dilpreet singh | 67 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 77
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics Pros Cons 93
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. Agree or disagree? 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree? 95
- People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life. What do you think about? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09507042254 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81077458702 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2129558234 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.545454545 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147384131784 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452408679963 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489022438769 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816177166666 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140220988627 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.