Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Recently, the phenomenon of considering sports and film superstars as a role model for youngsters and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this matter is highly beneficial for adolescents, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of celebrities on young generation can be a plus and I will elaborate this in further essay.
From a social standpoint, taking famous people like sportsperson and film stars can provide young people with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of encouraging towards their dream and promoting sense of motivation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on movie stars which discovered the influence of celebrities in social and professional life. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both in raising awareness and giving clear vision of goals among youngsters apparently can be seen.
From a realm of education, this issue might increase the consequences of violent behavior. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of acting could relate to this reality that the demerits of violence and inappropriate pertain to developing negative thoughts in their mind. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of celebrities is correlated negatively with the risk of health issue. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of considering role model to famous people far outweigh its drawbacks.
- University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 83
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 85
- If you are assigned to work on climate change what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57454545455 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21959701806 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5061158648 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117464330105 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353783838309 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543743509213 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644308471897 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420156574289 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.