Argument Essay
Sports in the news is important segment as many people are interested in sports news and follow it regularly. Obviously, removing this segment will turn many people away from the station. However, the manager’s notice that the drop in rating is just due to removing the sports segment is false because there may be other segments that people do not like or other radio stations might have made more creative decisions that attracted a lot of listeners.
By just sending a memo that reviving the Fred's sport will improve the ratings, the manager failed to access the overall content of the radio station. There may be other shows that people do not like, for example, some radio hosts are making racists comments in other programs but the manager is not taking these comments into consideration. Some of the shows may be worthless to listen to and people are tuning off the station. Thus, the manager’s inability of analyze the facets of other shows and how the audience are responding to other shows makes his argument illogical.
In addition to the inability to access the over situation of the station, there may be other radio stations that are making more creative contents and attracting the audiences. For example, inside the sports segment, along with the sports news, some station is also giving information on the emerging players and doing interviews with these players. Even in other segments they have added a celebrity talk show which attracts a lot of people in those stations. Hence, lack of additions of creative contents or new contents that attracts new audiences in the WAKM radio station might also be driving the listeners away from the station.
Besides failing to make more creative decisions, whole audiences members may not be listening to radio anymore. For example, YouTube and Netflix are some of the websites that are attracting a lot of people because of the new and original video contents. Podcasts also has a lot of new content because of which people are not listening to the radio any more.
Therefore, the inability of the manager to access what is happening within the station and believing that removing the sport segment is the major cause of the lack of audience of the station is unwarranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | areen-ali98 | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | Ibrahimtiamiyu | 16 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | devraj123 | 59 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | nadia_tavakoli | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Sai sushma | 63 | view |
- A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their number of colds caught per year and their team s records Of the players studied those who had the fewest colds had teams with the win loss ratios that were on av 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts that it is for them to learn facts. Agree or disagree? 60
- Argument Essay 16
- Nature should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even it these areas could be developed for natural gain. 50
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...king these comments into consideration. Some of the shows may be worthless to listen to and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...side the sports segment, along with the sports news, some station is also giving infor...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e. For example, YouTube and Netflix are some of the websites that are attracting a lot of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 378.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54063584401 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439153439153 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7415542803 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.70786347227 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0136625693268 0.218282227539 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00607264486154 0.0743258471296 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227217565034 0.0701772020484 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00781254631153 0.128457276422 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156250926231 0.0628817314937 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.