Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the dominance of English has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " will it remain as a global language despite globalization?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that English will remain dominant international language. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the linguistic standpoint, people's command of English is bound up inextricably with worldwide speakers, which indicates they lead to both multinational connections and global acceptance. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between learning a common language and being bilingual as well as an exponential increase in global training. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of knowledge process is positively correlated with not only English development but also teaching globally.
Within the realm of communication, without the slightest doubt, using a common language is attribute to communication improvement, in that it would come down to multinational companies, global trades and ease of understanding. A salient example of such attribution is language barriers, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take geographical borders for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint single-language speakers problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to cultural shock, misunderstanding and even communicative tasks. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of linguistic skills.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that English will remain as the global language despite the globalization. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, othersthink a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges? 88
- The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... language despite globalization?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that English ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90102389078 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46078114574 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651877133106 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5324702735 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326717040782 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890145252455 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999101543906 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192806119738 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966454809075 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.