Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this day and age, the natural environment destruction has been considered as the culprit of the distinction of some wild species. However, some people argue that there are too many institutions and governments are giving paramount attention to preserving wild animals and birds. I totally disagree with that idea because the wildlife always plays a significant role in the balance of ecosystem on the earth.
First of all, it is very important to protect all kinds of wild animals in order to maintain the biodiversity. The number of different species of plants, animals, and microorganisms contributes to climate stability as they can adjust naturally their surrounding areas. Some pollutants and wastes around them, most are discharged by humans activities, will be absorbed or transform into other harmless forms. For example, there are plants that can consume many poisonous gases released near factories and change them into useful chemical compounds. Larva of certain insects, can also eat the byproduct and rubbish made of plastic or nylon, hence not only reducing a great number of wastes each year but also being high-protein sources of food for birds.
Besides, many animals provide medicinal resources and pharmaceutical drugs such as the snake which has been proved to cure numerous diseases for the human race and become the symbol of the World Health Organization for years. Finally, natural habitats often attract thousands of tourists over the world so that they generate substantial profits for the local citizens and that country as well.
In conclusion, devoting many resources and concerns for the safety of wild animals and birds is crucial and worthwhile due to their importance in the existence of the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | baonguyennhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | dinelmao | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-25 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do u agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 82
- Some parents think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre-school age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors Do you agree or disagree 71
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to our natural environment. What are the causes and solutions? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30685920578 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77482327407 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653429602888 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5586565402 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213891436375 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752991735515 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879607121821 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129221370498 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972466442096 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.