Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is argued that while many people suppose participating solo sport games has certain advantages, others think that sports which are played by team are better. From my perspective, both sport forms have their distinctive merits and provide players with numerous physical and mental benefits.
On the one hand, solo sports are chosen by many people due to several reasons. Firstly, player take part in these sports would have opportunities to hone their independent thinking and decision-making skills. People are forced to consider every aspects of the problem and make their own decision independently without any one’s support. As a result, to achieve setting goal, they have to motive themselves by commitment resistant and inner efforts. Secondly, because individual sports like swimming or tennis no need partners to play, people can plan their own timetable. Hence, it is easier for them to maintain a regular training schedule. If they play sports with number of players, it would be difficult to find a day in week that everybody can attend.
On the other hand, team sports such as football are advantageous in different aspects. The first reason is that people can learn new skills through their team-mates which they would not find out in individual games. By this way player will improve themselves and become more mature during exercises. Another reason is that exposed in cooperative environment, they are taught about interpersonal skill which will be vital in their future work. In football, for example, each player has their position and different mission and they are trained to work together even sacrifice for the sake of their team.
In conclusion, I think that all sports offer great benefits for people’ mental and physical health and that people should choose whatever sport they are most interested in playing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | ketan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ajendrapatel | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Nguyenhuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Jiny Ju | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Javzaa | 56 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2007. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in five different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world? 89
- moving from rural areas to big cities 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25675675676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.678983759 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8275911051 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284081883618 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901613632814 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841796796597 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180507356581 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622852539509 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.