Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Climate change is undoubtedly a hot issue around the globe in this era. Regarding this matter, some people hold the view that the prevention of climate change might be replaced by the adaption to live with it. On my perspective, I totally disagree with this view.
Firstly, the prevention of climate change is irreplaceable because humans and animals, in the absence of fighting action against climate change, can be negatively affected. As a result of climate change, rising sea level and coastal soil erosion currently threaten people and industry that located on the coastal areas. Take Philippines as an example, this country lost around 200 ha of coastal land each year due to erosion and sea level rising. Furthermore, warming seawater, another consequence of this environmental problem, triggers the continuous death of coral reefs. In Nha Trang, a glamorous beach city in Vietnam, around hundreds square kilometer of coral reefs are going to die annually when the seawater temperature has increased around 2 degree Celsius.
Secondly, there is no way to live with climate change because physical qualifications of humans and other animals are unable to adapt the rapid change of environment today. If we accept climate change as a part of our lives, we have to face with a lot of fatal diseases like cancer and immunodeficiency diseases that caused by a fast-paced changing temperature, high density of polluted air and a great amount of greenhouse gas emissions (a major factor constituting climate change).
In conclusion, trying to adapt ourselves to the negatively changing environment is necessary to some extent, but I support the opinion of that it is unable to replace the important role of prevention towards climate change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Dheeraj0809 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Shruti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | Mimibae 985 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | phuongthuy1212 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in the fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Televisions influence the development of the creativity of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?. 78
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Simon Essays) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I totally disagree with this view. Firstly, the prevention of climate chang...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 768, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has increased around 2 degree Celsius. Secondly, there is no way to live with c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jor factor constituting climate change. In conclusion, trying to adapt ourselves...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26690391459 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9064560437 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9850112752 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.545454545 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226673768129 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853038511695 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691712656634 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142448763643 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426112434099 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.