Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition?
Recently, the phenomenon of the educational or food assistancy from rich countries to the poor ones has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by individuals, others hold opponents views and asserted that the poor countries should develop and meet these needs. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of supporting the deprived countries by the afluent ones by providing aducation and food supply provides the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of respecting to human beings. From my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these reasons. Firstly, loads of inhabitants in deprived nations live in unsutaible educational conditions and the youths are under the threat of missing the prosperous future. The lack of libraries, colleges, university and inappropriate curriculum and tutoring lead to some dropouts. Hence, it needs to more investment which may be presumably provided by the developed countries in order to bolster all conditions and nurture the sophisticated generations. Furthermore, some countries are dealing with supplying sufficient food for their people because some reasons including floods, hurricans, war or undeveloped agricultural sectors and they need foriegn assistants.
On the other hand, there is no doubt a considerable number of dwellers believe that the foriegn help is not the appropriate solution and the deprived countries should addrress these difficulties by their own ways. They argue that these governments should boost their economcs and focus on agricultural and educational issues to provide all facilities to meet their people's needs.
In comclusion, while there are seveal compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the foriegn aids can play a significant role to solve these problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | 3pid | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | mojtaba1980 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | Mani.Narimani | 85 | view |
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yeild to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 83
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. Agree or not? 11
- The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...g the deprived countries by the afluent ones by providing aducation and food supply ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, well, while, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52666666667 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02817143211 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8929546144 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215337985758 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665043286453 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520166410158 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104021536122 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602498479778 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.