Some people think imported food exerts positive impacts on our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the impact of imported food on individual's live has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the consequences of imported food?". Whereas it is a widely held view that imported food has positive impacts on our lives, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, imported products are bound up inextricably with foreign currency, which indicates they lead to both economy down turn and less manufacturing. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between packaging producer and farming goods as well as an exponential increase in village development. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of cotton industry is correlated positively with not only agricultural industry but also fertilized land.
Within the realm of health, without the slightest doubt, healthy food attribute to vegetables, in that it would come down to less heart disease, diabetes, and depression. A salient example of such attribution is husbandry, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take daily product for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ignorance of domestic market problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to food chain, nutrition values, and even food retailers. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of agronomy and using advanced techniques in farming.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of imported food outweigh its advantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions? 77
- Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class. Self-study is a good way for them to study more effectively. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.) 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, imported pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...industry but also fertilized land. Within the realm of health, without the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng advanced techniques in farming. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74829931973 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12308064987 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687074829932 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0807631755 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160424686433 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483219914664 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696099662954 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996887728661 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973773996095 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.