Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Nowadays, placing an advertisement in the public areas is booming at a rapid pace, especially in the school zone. While some people think that placing an advertisement in the school area is a good source for business and helps to have more funds, others argue that schools are not an appropriate place for these kinds of advertisements, which can lead to bad experiences among children. I believe this notion of impacting children's life by placing ads in the school zone. This essay discusses both sides of the arguments and will lead to a logical conclusion.
To start with, beyond doubt, advertisements are of paramount importance for many businesses, and it is a prime source of every business. Placing an advertisement in the school zone creates a massive positive impact on people as more people are running around the school these days. For example, making ads in school is good eyesight for children and they easily get attract with these colorful boards. Hence, most of the children prefer to get those items that show in those advertisements. Additionally, they ask their parents to get into that. Therefore, placing an advertisement in school premises is a good source for earning funds.
Nevertheless, there is a school of thought that places colorful advertisements on the school site would not be a wise approach as school children get affected due to these ads. First of all, it encourages children to buy the thing that is available on the advertisement board without considering the impact of it. For example, Maggi ads, banned in India, show a colorful background in big size banners which could lead to dire illness to the children. Thus, parents should educate their children about these kinds of products about good or bad.
To conclude, considering the negative insights discussed above, I believe that promoting advertisements in the school zone creates a significant impact on people. The government should take responsibility to prevent such an advertisement in a school zone, but instead of it, the government should focus on awareness advertisements on the school site such as go green, pollution impact, minimal water usage and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 75
- Some people point that experiential learning i e learning by doing it can work well in formal education However others think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges 90
- Large Shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion? Do you think this is a good or bad change. 80
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges? 77
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, first of all, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 31.9359605911 178% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 355.0 242.827586207 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14929577465 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98004205751 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.804053437 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319459907669 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108165848541 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809264632779 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202156176737 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705704450786 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.