The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of energy generated from five different sources, namely Hydropower, Oil, Nuclear power, Coal, Natural gas, in a particular nation between 1983 and 2003.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that OIl was the main resource of energy in both years despite a slight decrease. Besides, this country used more nuclear power and natural gas to produce power by 2003.
In 1983, the total energy was made by OIl occupying nearly half, at 42%, the second location was the coal with at 23%. Over the two decades ensuing, the rate of these two arrays decreased. Detail, the percentage of energy produced from oil saw a slight fall by 4%, while the figure for Coal went down 13%.
Regarding three other sources, Nuclear power and Natural gas contributed 20% and 11% into the sum of energy in 1983, respectively. Over the next twenty years, these number had a growth, Nuclear power only increased mildly up 4%, whilst the figure for Natural Gas doubled to 21%. On the other hand, hydropower remained relatively at 4% of energy manufactured in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- Everyone should stay at school until 18 To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 56
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent you do agree or disagree 84
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, regarding, second, so, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91397849462 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47094925922 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4440860196 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210277526293 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835239110345 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718701399899 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137276575152 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064088976914 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.