Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
There has been a growing tendency for advertising. There are both liabilities and utilities to this, though overall, it is a welcome development. This essay will highlight the contribution to the growth of the economy as the biggest advantage of commercial film, followed by an analysis of the primary disadvantage, namely how it could lead to an increasingly materialistic society, is not valid.
From an economic point of view, a booming advertising industry brings a myriad of merits. A genuinely prominent claim to deliberate is that the lager this industry is, the lower unemployment rates would be. The rationale behind this is that advertising is a creative industry that employs many people, stems from logo designer to commercial film director, and hence, without advertisements, they would be jobless. The Times recently reported that advertising is the second largest industry in Korea. What further amplifies the argument expressed above is that the development of advertisements leads to a better living standard. This borne by the fact that by frequently watching advertisements through the internet or on television, people could aware of the choices that they have, therefore, they could compare different products on sale and choose an item at the most reasonable price. According to the PEW Center, 56% of Vietnamese people agreed that advertisements inform them about a greater array of selections.
A separate school of thought, however, suggests that the rise in the number of advertisements could lead to an increasingly materialistic society; however, this is not accurate. A logical justification for this is that advertisements frequently use celebrities to promote brand images and associate those with higher status, thus, people are persuaded that buying a product would make them feel happier. Yet, despite this fact, such is still inferior to the advantage discussed.
Subsequently, weighing all the aforementioned, it can be safely stated that the bombard of advertisements can be advantageous to the economy as it helps people approach a better range of options and reduce unemployment rates and although it can sometimes be a contributing factor to a materialistic society, it is a very crucial part in the growth of economic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 73
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree of disagree with this opinion 56
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities 78
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mentioned, it can be safely stated that the bombard of advertisements can be advantageous t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40960451977 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24473979938 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.843860394 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.785714286 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671240084878 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257906875887 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246661872729 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347835324364 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299379403564 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.