In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problem as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Busy life makes many people need to try to save time as much as they can. As a result, fast food becomes an effective way and the best choice of generations including children and adult. However, excessive consumption of this kind of food cause healthy problem. Some people that imposition a higher tax is suitable solution to discourage people from eating junk food. Personally, I partly agree with this idea because of following reasons.
Firstly of all, increasing taxes would raise price and reduce consumption. Fast food companies would pass these taxes to consumer in the form of higher prices and this would lead to people not being to afford junk food because it is too expensive. Junk food may become a luxury item and people need to consider more carefully when they plan to buy it. Furthermore, the tax money collected can be used to improve public works.
On the other hand, the government also should consider other effective solutions to solve this problem. Creating awareness about the ill-effects of fast food by health education is supposed an important method to change mind and behavior of citizens. Not only children need to be aware of the danger of junk food which cause them suffer from diseases such as obesity, heart-attack… but also their parents should spend more time on cooking to prepare nutritious, healthy meal for families. Additionally, advertising of fast food also should be restricted on media channels. Besides, campaign of propaganda for avoidance sickness from fast food have remarkable influence to people.
In conclusion, to reduce the figure of people who have excessive consumption of fast food, I believe that the government should apply at the same time some solutions in which levy high tax is the one of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | GAURAV KAUSHAL | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | Abror077 | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-13 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 73 | view |
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problem they should tax private car heavily To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so government should focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that it is better for people to be unemployed than people to be employed but they do not enjoy To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
...ould lead to people not being to afford junk food because it is too expensive. Junk ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsider more carefully when they plan to buy it. Furthermore, the tax money colle...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03754266212 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66886778351 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.674385377 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354318811634 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113430726976 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621969491333 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208715444821 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667814115004 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.