Old buildings have to be replaced by new one. To what extent do you a free or disagree
Most of the governments considering the ancient buildings as nations cultural heritage. Even though, Some people claim that rather than renovation of old constructions that money should be spent on demolition and new constructions. I partially agree with this as some of the ancient constructions are considered as a revenue source and irreplaceable cultural identity of the country and some have to be destroyed.
Firstly, the most countries tourism department has been preserving historic buildings with great care as it is one of the economical assets. Moreover, such buildings have lots of employees and building premises includes small scale shopping centres which are a source of income for the civilians. For example, Pink city in Jaipur is the best example of the above-mentioned reasons.
Secondly, some of the old buildings had unique features and identity in terms of artefacts, beauty and complexity. Furthermore, lots of such places are embedded with respectful anecdotes. For instance, Thaj Mahal is one of the wonders of the world had a sentimental romantic story behind the construction.
However, Some peoples who prefer to destroy old buildings states that such buildings no longer meet today's safety standards which leads to unexpected collapse of building at any time. For instance, the Mullaperiyar dam in Kerala is one of the ancient construction which expecting disaster at any time.
Secondly, the most effective way to increase property value is demolishing the building which helps to increase the market value of the property.
To conclude this, I firmly believe that protecting the old building as nations valuable assets by the citizens of the same is necessary to show patriotism. At the same unwanted and weak buildings have to be destroyed.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- A lot of money is spent on repairing old buildings instead of repairing old building that money should be spent on knocking down old building and building new ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Old buildings have to be replaced by new one To what extent do you a free or disagree 61
- GOVERNMENT SHOULD FUND SCIENTIFIC RATHER THAN COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATION TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE STATEMENT Scientific research plays a significant role in the development of the country in many ways It s commonly held belief that cou 61
- Nowadays many students have the opportunity to study for part or all of the course in foreign countries While studying abroad brings many benefits to individual students it also brings a number of disadvantages Discuss advantage and disadvantages of study 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers and books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give reasons for your answers with any relevant examples 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uctions. I partially agree with this as some of the ancient constructions are considered as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e to be destroyed. Firstly, the most countries tourism department has been preserving ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e above-mentioned reasons. Secondly, some of the old buildings had unique features and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02627945619 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3466934307 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207527683263 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702872692395 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462283615505 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102074683859 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388659633552 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uctions. I partially agree with this as some of the ancient constructions are considered as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e to be destroyed. Firstly, the most countries tourism department has been preserving ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e above-mentioned reasons. Secondly, some of the old buildings had unique features and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02627945619 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3466934307 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207527683263 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702872692395 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462283615505 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102074683859 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388659633552 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.