Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce this?
Public concern has arisen about negative pressures from schools, family, society and even peers that children are suffering from these days. In this essay, I will analyse the reasons of this phenomenon and suggest some solutions as well.
The causes of these pressures are manifold. The fundamental factor that we need to take into consideration is the increasing role of education in the modern world. More specifically, society is now requiring too much from children and even establish a system of standards that they have to achieve, including tests, assignments and educational goals for schools. As a result, although this has significant effects on improving the education system, children take a huge burden to satisfy these expectations. Above all, the larger gap between the rich and poor may lead to inequality in education as children from different backgrounds get varied educational conditions. Not all parents can provide their children with expensive learning tools and equipments. Therefore, they may suffer from jealousy and pressure to be dominant in other aspects.
Giving the above reasons, I am convinced that immediate actions should be taken to combat this situation. Priority should be given to the increase in education budget. In other words, government needs to make great efforts to guarantee the learning opportunities for every child by financial aids or scholarships. In addition, educational methods should be changed into less competitive ones so that children can be evaluated by their strong points and attempts rather than test scores and homework handouts.
All things considered, I firmly believe that children’s huge pressures are the consequences of overrated expectations and diverse learning conditions. Accordingly, it is generally advisable that the government should implement efficient policies to improve educational system and evaluation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | panchal dhruv | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-22 | Harman97 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Successful Sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment Discuss some of the arguments for and or against keeping animals in zoos Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98770853148 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2811994083 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.466666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238278544322 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085665925419 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067780386114 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13951706758 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350055407699 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98770853148 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2811994083 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.466666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238278544322 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085665925419 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067780386114 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13951706758 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350055407699 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.