Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and imports as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary society, food shortage has become a tremendous problem in many nations. In addition, authorities should try to produce more provisions for their residents and imported food should be restricted. In my point of view, i totally disapprove with this statement as it is impossible to donate sufficient provisions for all people, and imported food contribute largely to well-rounded meals.
On the other hand, some nations fail to provide enough food for the whole population, especially underdeveloped countries undergoing financial burden. For example, Zimbabwe, a nation which is recently plagued by poverty and substandard life quality, find it difficult to alleviate famine. Hence, obliging them to donate enough foodstuffs for all residents seems to be a demanding task.
Moreover, import is also an important process, especially in this globalized society. One of the main advantageous impact is that humans can enjoy a diversity of ingredients which are non-existent in their own nations. For instance, it is Vietnam that residents start to consume French cuisines such as pizza, sausages on a daily basis. Consequently, it will be a huge loss if government prohibits import products and people depend solely on local ingredients. Secondly, such an enhancement in food quality is also worth-mentioning. In these recent days, thanks to the expansion of imported nutrients, many international organizations improve their strategies and ingredients’ quality to compete with other companies. That means each individual can enjoy more high-quality dishes than in the ancient period.
Taking everything into consideration, since imported food can bring significant benefits and food provided for every resident seems to be insufficient in some impoverished countries, I totally disagree with the initial statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | quynhnhi280103 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-09 | crystalrichard | 84 | view |
- In modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products for instance clothing or medicine To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- It is natural process for animal species to become extinct dinosaurs and dodos There is no reason for people to prevent them from this happening To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people claim that many things that children are taught at school are a waste of time Other people argue that everything study at school is useful at some time Discuss both views and give opinion 68
- As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 80
- 28 The table below gives information about transportation of five kinds of products imported from Hong Kong in 1999 and 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and imported food should be restricted. In my point of view, i totally disapprove ...
^^
Line 4, column 749, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanies. That means each individual can enjoy more high-quality dishes than in t...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g significant benefits and food provided for every resident seems to be insuffici...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72262773723 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2538619947 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9626464821 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255853278502 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817589949669 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760606701472 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162587790173 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719254434215 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.