The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The chart gives information about the amount spent on consumer goods in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
It is clear that Britain spent the most on each consumer goods among the four European countries listed. However, in tennis racquets, Italy was practically the same as Britain. Germany and France were the lowest spenders. In personal stereos, France and Germany were almost the same as the number of under 150. While Germany’s amount spent has never passed through 150, France’s number not only passed 150 but even reached near up to 170.
Italy generally followed the middle bar on each consumer goods. Yet in toys the number was the same as France, they both were just under 160. Germany spent the least on toys, CDs, and photographic film. Nevertheless, France spent way more on these goods that Italy followed right after Germany.
The overall picture is that there are significant differences in spending habits in the four European countries given on the chart.
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries today there is an attitude that anyone can do it in the arts music literature acting art etc As a result people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated Do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'but' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buts'.
Suggestion: buts
...50, France’s number not only passed 150 but even reached near up to 170. Italy g...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11728395062 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39172639087 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1661554144 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3636363636 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7272727273 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283195853598 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104175942239 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119827375066 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193300644898 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666696847453 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.