Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way?
Recently, the phenomenon of repetitive routine has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “would it be effective to have some repetitive routine, such as eating the same food?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that having a routine is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-psychology standpoint, a sustainable lifestyle is bound up inextricably with healthy habits, which indicates they lead to both motivation and self-esteem. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and sedentary lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in professional achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of changing attitudes is correlated positively with not only personality traits but also globalization.
Within the realm of behavioral patterns, without the slightest doubt, mundane tasks attribute to being risk-averse, in that it would come down to a monotonous diet, tedious, and boring life. A salient example of such attribution is a radical agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take alternative solutions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint welfare system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the positive dimensions of having an ordinary life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that avoiding repetitive routine leads to an effective life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | ptepractice | 77 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Basil3241 | 55 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | halbouni1984 | 65 | view |
| 2018-01-27 | azzitta | 95 | view |
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to develop countries This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in develop countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Medical technology can increase the human s life expectancy Is it blessing or curse Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 55
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience 77
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or Disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71232876712 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29752376431 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674657534247 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4916510532 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.307692308 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130204450133 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383752812605 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743927540682 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859782144031 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100594540308 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.