Today, TV channels provide men’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
These days, it is common that more male athletes’ programs are broadcasted on TV than those of female players. This essay will mention several reasons for this tendency and justifications that sport shows should include more female athletes’ presence.
There are certain causes of the more popularity of men’s sports programs on TV. The major reason is that men seem to dominate the sports world. Indeed, most prevalent sports, such as football and basketball, are physically demanding. Thus, male athletes tend to outperform their female counterparts due to the fact that most males are biologically stronger than people of the opposite gender. Another convincing justification is that sports TV shows tend to be profit-oriented. In other words, producers seem to put a spotlight on programs that can expect the high viewership. In fact, audiences are more likely to enjoy sports with much competition and intensity that can be satisfied by male athletes’ aggressive way of performance, for instance, in playing boxing or racing.
However, programs featuring women doing sports should receive the same duration of broadcast time with men’s shows. Firstly, female athletes can be as outstanding as male players. Despite male dominance in competitive sports culture, women can excel in specific types of sports, for example ballet, yoga, aerobics, which may require a great deal of flexibility and patience. Another compelling reason is that introducing more women’s sports shows on TV can pave the way for gender equality. Indeed, female players might have been subject to rigors of training to scale the heights of their sports profession. Thus, they should deserve the equal level of merits as men do. In the long run, bridging the gender disparity in the sports world can create knock-on effects that the general public would recognize women based on their achievements in other aspects of life.
In conclusion, male-dominated sports shows can be attributed to their superior physical strength and public preference. However, such programs should feature more female athletes since they with their abilities and diligence can deserve recognition and gender equality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more 73
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encourage to attend and learn more 73
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 56
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...instance in playing boxing or racing However programs featuring women doing sports s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 758, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rld can create knockon effects that the general public would recognize women based on their ac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 847, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir achievements in other aspects of life In conclusion maledominated sports shows...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28613569322 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66723112516 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52802359882 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 339.0 20.2975951904 1670% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1792.0 106.682146367 1680% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 339.0 20.7667163134 1632% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 123.0 7.06120827912 1742% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405481145248 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.405481145248 0.084324248473 481% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255566510131 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995572296236 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 173.0 13.0946893788 1321% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -272.61 50.2224549098 -543% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 135.5 11.3001002004 1199% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.88 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.6 8.58950901804 286% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 137.6 10.1190380762 1360% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.