Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison. Instead, they should do unpaid work in the community. To what extent do you agree?
A section of society argues that certain kind of offenders should provide free service to society rather than going to jail. I personally support this notion because of the several reasons.
A negative point of putting all lawbreakers in prison to consider is that Criminals, who do not commit a serious misdeed, may come under influence of dangerous offenders. This is because all types of offenders are kept in the same place and they have impact on each other to a certain extent, as a result of which they can be detrimental to society once they are out of prison and also they will meet new criminals of the same mindset which will increase the tendency to make more crimes. For instance, a person who is a thief may be swayed by a murderer and may plan to commit an illicit Offence in the future. Instead, if such people are used for a proper purpose then it can be beneficial for the community.
Furthermore, complementary services set a platform in which delinquents won't be exposed to all those forms of learning in various criminal areas which can lead to criminal intents. Moreover, culprits are given an appreciable opportunity to turn over a new leaf in their life.
Another reason why I oppose the imprisonment of all criminals is that keeping malefactors in custody would be costly and useless. The government has to spend a huge amount of money on expenses like food, clothes, and guards for confinement. Besides, wrongdoers who are locked up are no threat to the society, and rehabilitation programmes provide a transition in their lifestyle before release. Principles of group therapy operate as therapeutic community in which convicts are psychologically manipulated so that they won't be subjected to recidivism. Although rule breakers receive the possibility of revitalization with the help of the recovering strategies, They ought to be punished to perform free of charge physical labour through which they figure out the significance of law infringement.
In conclusion, incarcerating criminals who have not caused menacing to society does not deter them from reoffence and may not reform them. Moreover, keeping them in jail is Implementation of dominant power upon minor criminals as well as unaffordable cost while community service tends to be more beneficial for both sides, offenders, and the society.
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 47
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think that this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one l 56
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it can be beneficial for the community. Furthermore, complementary services set ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09375 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98727317101 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4750261216 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134121256325 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359021103711 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334225254091 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064069996886 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336492309508 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.