. To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Most people agree that higher wages for professors affects the quality of education. Personally, I strongly believe that salary is not a crucial factor that can determine the levels of education. I am of this opinion for two certain reason that I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, I definitely think that universities should pay more attention on the organisation and administration rather on financial issues. Of course, I am sure that money motivates everyone to work but it is not directly related to this. In my view, there are several indicators such as elaborating strong laws and fair regulations, offering more opportunities for students in creating relationships with their professors, taking part in research or work practice and even more. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I remember when I was in the university, a few of my teachers were not capable to give lessons. They were young graduate students, with a few months career. No one in my class could take them serious. When it comes to education, I push forth the idea that universities should hire only professional individuals with a wide background or years of work experience. As a result, I suggest that stronger admission requirements should be applied when hiring new staff.
Another factor to consider is the work environment. Not only the salary help the university teachers go ahead, but also where and whom they work with. What is worth noting is the comparison of the salaries of two different university teacher. My friend works in a private university as a mathematics professor. She is facing with so many problems on her workplace, so she has applied for another job in the same position but in another university. The struggle is the fact that she is getting paid very well but their politics and staff do not make the university she is working a great place to work, due to the fact that is does not support collaboration with other departments. For that reason, my friend has accepted a new job with a lower salary but it seems a happier environment.
In conclusion, I do not support the idea that universities should pay higher wages to their staff to improve the quality considering the fact that there are even more elements with the same level of importance, that take part in the process of building a high reputition of university for a better education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would he more satisfying 70
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- burning mirror 90
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'teacher' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'teachers'.
Suggestion: teachers
...he salaries of two different university teacher. My friend works in a private universit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93596059113 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95399378038 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4533171905 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290199542512 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791960658488 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742305091568 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180887889652 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542113325694 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.