Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
concerning the issue of food preparation, it is widely believed that fast food will increase prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods. As far as I am concerned, I do partially agree with this point of view due to several reasons below.
First of all, it can be said with certainty that fast foods are extremely convenient for human's economic situation nowadays. this is due to the fact that fast foods can be prepared and consumed rapidly, compared to a time-consuming preparation of traditional foods. Second of all, a subsequent factor could be because the favour of fast foods attracts people a lot. For example, in the USA, numerous beefburgers are comsumed every day due to their taste and ingredients. Last but not least, the brands of convenient foods have a a variety of accurate advertising campaign. A clear case of this reason is that Lotte has a special discount program monthly, especially in festivals for all their customers to participate in. Therefore, the number of people who eat fast foods has increased significantly.
In contrast, it must be admitted that traditional foods have some benefits outweigh fast foods. For example, with the same price, traditional foods have a wide range of foods which is much healthier than convenient foods. Moreover, the majority of people nowadays are in favour of traditional one. For instance, in Vietnam, the citizens prefer fresh food due to its better and closer taste.
Taking everything into consideration, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issue should be supported. However, the discussions are convincing enough to lead me to the conclusion that although fast foods has increased dramatically, they will never be able to replace the traditional foods and methods
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Concerning
concerning the issue of food preparation, it is wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...for humans economic situation nowadays. this is due to the fact that fast foods can ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...st, the brands of convenient foods have a a variety of accurate advertising campaig...
^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st, the brands of convenient foods have a a variety of accurate advertising campa...
^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...st, the brands of convenient foods have a a variety of accurate advertising campaig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93299003673 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7306578734 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430439859019 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144813391991 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104222223045 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291513490397 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602491972134 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.