The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The two maps give information about the development in the layout of the waterfront area in Darwin town from 2009 to 2014.
In general, it can be seen that the town changed from an industrial area to a residential and recreational place. The layout of the town had no change, while the transportation system was renovated.
The large industrial area replaced trees and footpaths called the green area. In the center of the town, three new residential buildings were erected, adjacent to three old ones. On the west of the map, the university building was demolished, and a lake was located in the circle remained. The swimming pool was relocated to the industrial area, while the convention school and school stayed unchanged.
In terms of access, there was a newly-constructed harbor on the seashore and a footpath to connect the harbor with the main road in the west of the town. In contrast, the footpath which encircles the center of the town was unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The following chart shows the percentages of favorite pastime activities of children in some Asian and African countries 78
- Some people claim that public museums and art allergies will not be needed because people can see historical objects and worksk of art using a computer To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- making wool
- The increase of production of consumer goods damages the natural environment Why is this the case What can be done to reduce it 84
- The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 3 years 2005 2010 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88414634146 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89994640866 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7406200986 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224143207334 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924185183603 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890187206958 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151978806766 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966568788857 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.