Nowadays, it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
These days, producing film is easier for everyone thanks to digital technology, not only huge firms. This statement has both pros and cons and I will explain my view below.
On the one hand, It is very popular with people to use the Internet. There are many applications that allow us to make videos and edit them; therefore, users can be more creative in making content. For example, on some applications like Youtube or Tiktok, people can upload some video that suits their hobby, just with one smartphone, they could shoot and edit short films easily and post it on that platform. As a result, if their videos were fascinating, they would get a huge amount of likes, comments and even more they could earn money from their clips.
On the other hand, some video-makers produce films for commercial purposes instead of art. There are some products with low quality or low quality content. This would affect viewers and society. As an example, when students access the Internet frequently, they often imitate the act of an actor when they watch a movie with bad content, like fighting scenes or criminal actors.
To conclude, the development of different film producers brings advantages and disadvantages. One side, people can make money from filmmaking today, but the other side is that it would produce not only the quality video, but also bad movies that affect to young generations.
- Now many people spend less and less time at home What are the causes for this What are the effects of this on individuals and on the society 56
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day Write at least 150 words 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92765957447 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48428287142 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621276595745 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5935013941 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140654589433 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596695668365 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618996954146 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102926431574 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523115527736 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.