Now many people spend less and less time at home. What are the causes for this? What are the effects of this on individuals and on the society?
In today's busy life, most people have to chase survival. As a result, they are no longer able to devote more time to their homes. And this phenomenon of modern society affects both individuals and society. The purpose of this essay is to explain my views on this issue.
First of all, this is true because people get deep into work most of the time in one day. They want to hang out to relieve stress and change the atmosphere for this reason. Or they simply spend time out with friends and family in their spare time. Furthermore, they do not want to be in a circle from home to school or work. They may feel trapped and exhausted. For instance, in Covid-19, there is a report that divorce has increased because of isolation, so couples could not find their own space and felt trapped.
And the fact that they get out so much will have a lot of impact on themselves and society. For individuals, they may find an additional source of motivation or a hobby that improves their lives more than in the past. Not only that but it can also enhance their emotional state and work progress, find new inspiration. But if they hang out too much and if the cost of each outing is too expensive, they have an additional financial burden. And one day they will barely pay for this model. In addition to indirectly boosting the economy and the entertainment industry, they have had a positive impact on society back at home without changing anything.
In conclusion, spending less time at home is an inevitable phenomenon and has a huge impact on both individuals and society. This can be seen in the form of increased spending on recreation, travel, and other leisure activities. Moreover, people are spending more time outside of the home, engaging in activities that help to build relationships and create a sense of community. Finally, spending more time away from home has also enabled people to pursue new interests and explore new areas.
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Write about the following topic Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 61
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 61
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6783625731 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54806401234 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3489446708 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252918854875 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784934374699 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648548859808 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169231946399 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742565194913 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6783625731 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54806401234 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3489446708 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252918854875 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784934374699 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648548859808 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169231946399 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742565194913 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.