Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Yes, I agree with the given statement that "Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts". Decison making should be done by someone who has power to corroborate the decisions and should be able to change decisions drastically too (if some problem occurs which cannot be solved). Politicians have such powers as, they are elected by the public. Politicians are guiuded by government experts who has knowledge of the situations and can conform the hypotheses with help of everybody else in the main body.
The reason provided can supported by the following example, during 1990s India was going through finacncial transformation all the people in the country were worried that if country goes bankrupt what will happen to them and their families? This was the general view of the public but politician and government experts were thinking about saving the everybody not just their family members. So, then Prime Minister of India had a small discussion with finance department which was led by Manmohan Singh. Manmohan Singh with the help of other experts came to a solution to open the India for manufacturing economy before, this decision India was a closed economy that means only things produced in India could be sold in the country this rule was making India go default. All the government experts gathered data like how much money is owed by each state to central government, they calculated deficit of each state and all other paramters and accordingly, gave many Multinational Corporations's some special rights to exercise in the states. This reform helped India from going default and helped in taking step in globalization.
On the contrary we can see Venezuela, a country who has more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia, UAE, USA is going bankrupt today because all its dictator did were fill their own pockets. In instance, to make people's life easier the government made some resources free to the public like petroleum this worsened situation. People of the country didn't want free petroleum but other resources of the country like medical care, insurance and other life saving policies. Politician and government experts were being more informed than everyone took a wrong judgment for the general public leading to a crisis which could not be controlled. The government was working with affluent families who indirectly were ruling people on behalf of government. Therefore, government could not take any decision for the people but they did take decision for themselves and affluent families. If decisions were to left to the general public I am sure the situation right now in Venezuela could have been averted and people of the country would have been happy.
Though, politican and government experts are always far more informed we cannot always say that they have better judgment and can see through point of view of general public as we can from the situation in Venezuela but, the case in India Was different government always saw better for the general public and did thought from point of view of them. Not always politicians and experts are good but public is too sometime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | Ying_CHU4.0 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | sam 27 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 66 | view |
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 58
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...can supported by the following example, during 1990s India was going through finacncial tran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everybody'?
Suggestion: the; everybody
...ment experts were thinking about saving the everybody not just their family members. So, then...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rupt today because all its dictator did were fill their own pockets. In instance, to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rsened situation. People of the country didnt want free petroleum but other resources...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... everyone took a wrong judgment for the general public leading to a crisis which could not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 905, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ilies. If decisions were to left to the general public I am sure the situation right now in Ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nt and can see through point of view of general public as we can from the situation in Venezue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nt government always saw better for the general public and did thought from point of view of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...w better for the general public and did thought from point of view of them. Not always ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, then, therefore, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2639.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10444874275 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.635345234 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481624758221 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 820.8 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9071805591 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.894736842 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2105263158 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05263157895 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385431242552 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125795515138 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106417340821 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259794065977 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869323452733 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.