The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households* with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001.
The given bar chart gives information about how the proportion of households using cars in a nation of Europe over a period of 30 years starting from 1971 to 2001.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, it is clear that an upward trend was seen in the rate of households owning 1 car and 2 or more cars, while the opposite was true for the figure for the not-using-car household. In addition, the percentage of 1-car households experienced the most noticeable change over the given period.
In 1971, the proportion of households not using a car was the highest, at about 47%, while the figure for 2-or-more-car households was significantly lower, at roughly a third of the no-car household's rate. At the same time, the percentage of households that have one car accounted for approximately 35%. After two decades, a remarkable rise was seen in the rate of households owning one car, which helped this criterion to reach a peak of roughly 47%, while the figure for no-car households had overcome a dramatic decline to about 30%.
In 2001, although the percentage of one-car households declined slightly by 4% to roughly 43%, it still remained the highest figure of the three criteria. Additionally, while an insignificant decline of 2% to 28% was seen in the rate of households that do not use cars, the figure for 2 or more cars witnessed a fluctuation and rose to 28%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | naalasadan | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | TDuong994 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | quynhtran8 | view |
- The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77824267782 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88360114215 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7778262372 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270961801349 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155081364063 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450641364931 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186108230693 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198932723943 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77824267782 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88360114215 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7778262372 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270961801349 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155081364063 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450641364931 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186108230693 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198932723943 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.