“All the students should be required to take the drivers education course at Centerville high school. In the past two years several accidents in and around have involved teenager drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that they are too busy to teach their teenagers to drive, some instructions is necessary to ensure that these teenage drivers are safe drivers. Although there are two driving schools in Centerville, parents on a tight budget cannot afford to pay for driving instruction. Therefore an effective and mandatory program sponsored by the high school is the only solution to this serious problem.”
The author claims that all the students should be required to take the drivers education course at Centreville high school. The argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. To justify his conclusion author states that all students from the Centreville should have driving education course at Centreville high school, the author here reasons that most of the accidents happen in or near by Centreville is because of teenage drivers in past two years. However, careful examination of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for the authors conclusion. Hence, the argument can be considered incomplete.
First of all, the argument readily assumes that all the students should have education course in Centreville high school because several accidents in and around involves teenage drivers. This is merely an assumption made without much solid ground. For example no records are there to prove that the teenagers who are involved in several accidents are from Centreville. Teenagers might be from another city. Hence the argument would have been much more convincing if it explicitly states that teenage drivers should take education course in whichever state they live.
The argument readily claims that in the past two years accidents in and around involved teenage drivers so they should take drivers education course in centreville high school. This again is a weak and unsupported claim as it does not demonstrate correlation between certain accidents happened because of teenage drivers and they should go to Centreville high school for driving education course. To illustrate further, why should every teenagers have education course in Centreville high school? , why did author guess every teenager involved in accident don’t know driving? . If the argument have provided some stats showing that every teenager involved in accident don’t know driving then it would be more convincing to the reader.
Finally, the author cites number of parents in Centreville have complained that they are too busy to teach their teenagers to driver. However careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for the authors conclusion in several critical respects, and raises several sceptical questions. For example, what number parents have complained? What other instructions are necessary for the teenagers? . Without convincing answers to these questions, the reader is left with the impression that the claim made by author are more wishful than some specific evidence.
In conclusion, the authors argument is unpersuasive as it stands, to bolster it further author must provide clear and better evidence, perhaps by reliable survey or detailed analysis of teenagers involved in several accidents in and around Centreville knows the driving. Finally, to better assess the argument, it would be necessary to know more information about how teenagers involved in accidents don’t know driving?
- THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT FUND ANY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WHOSE CONSEQUENCES ARE UNCLEAR. 70
- “All the students should be required to take the drivers education course at Centerville high school. In the past two years several accidents in and around have involved teenager drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that the 66
- The best way for society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by installing in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. others believe that children's peer groups and parent as their role models are a much more powerful influence on child 50
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people'sefficiency so that everyone has more leisure time." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
...students should be required to take the drivers education course at Centreville high sc...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...that most of the accidents happen in or near by Centreville is because of teenage drive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 600, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rovides little credible support for the authors conclusion. Hence, the argument can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
.... Teenagers might be from another city. Hence the argument would have been much more ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion course in Centreville high school? , why did author guess every teenager inv...
^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed in accident don't know driving? . If the argument have provided some stat...
^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rovides little credible support for the authors conclusion in several critical respects...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ctions are necessary for the teenagers? . Without convincing answers to these que...
^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...pecific evidence. In conclusion, the authors argument is unpersuasive as it stands, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'authors'?
Suggestion: authors
...ive as it stands, to bolster it further author must provide clear and better evidence,...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258754863813 0.25644967241 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.169260700389 0.15541462614 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0953307392996 0.0836205057962 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0408560311284 0.0520304965353 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291828793774 0.0272364105082 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140077821012 0.125424944231 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0428015564202 0.0416121511921 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71077465411 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252918287938 0.026700313972 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0817120622568 0.113004496875 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0272373540856 0.0255425247493 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136186770428 0.0127820249294 107% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3011.0 2731.13054187 110% => OK
No of words: 465.0 446.07635468 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.4752688172 6.12365571057 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.475268817204 0.378187486979 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.382795698925 0.287650121315 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245161290323 0.208842608468 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14623655914 0.135150697306 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71077465411 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 207.018472906 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443010752688 0.469332199767 94% => OK
Word variations: 49.3428916408 52.1807786196 95% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.039408867 120% => OK
Sentence length: 19.375 23.2022227129 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5447709449 57.7814097925 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.458333333 141.986410481 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.2022227129 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 0.724660767414 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 3.58251231527 279% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 57.6545698925 51.9672348444 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.84552845528 1.8405768891 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.629964763561 0.441005458295 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110692033205 0.135418324435 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102100461361 0.0829849096947 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48037606812 0.58762219726 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.212224629868 0.147661913831 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218692154617 0.193483328276 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158455172245 0.0970749176394 163% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388257394005 0.42659136922 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102511908586 0.0774707102158 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433297729081 0.312017818177 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928212297138 0.0698173142475 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.87684729064 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 13.0 5.36822660099 242% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 14.657635468 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.