A society develops the technology in communicating devices rapidly such as smart phones, tablets and other communicating devices. Some people claims that the disadvantages of such device outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The improvement of standard of living has derived from the technological development, especially in communicating devices, and which has brought the significant consequences to our society; the comfortableness and convenience lifestyles are phenomenon results. Although the dark side of this development can be severe, the beneficial for this development is more significant than its drawbacks.
A Technology development has brought our lifestyles become convenient. Nowadays, the youth is known as an information age since the information received from the technological devices are massive. With this, people can make global friends and can be able to grasp various knowledge. For the company's perspective, they can easily connect and communicate with the international departments that can provide the opportunity for broaden the companies. Therefore, the communication technology development had improved the way of communicating between people and which has enhanced the standard of living.
In contrast, it is undeniable that the physical damages and psychological damages would be inevitable by using of this device for a long period. The most common physical damages can be the addictions, ADHD, eyesight, backache, turtle neck syndrome and other psychological damages. Those psychological impact would be relating to the social skills which are significantly decreasing for the young generations. It is very common to see that the young teenagers are having a difficulty to physical communication with others without having their technological devices' help. The development of technologies in communicating devices can result in various harmful effects in people's mind and body as well as their social skills, but it cannot remove such device from our daily usage.
Despite all those fatal impact on people's mind and body, the communicating device is helpful in our society. Since the geographical isolation is no-longer disturbing in the people's relationship, people can easily communicate with anyone at their convenient. Therefore, it is difficult to control its usage.
In conclusion, the technological development has enabling our society become comfortable and the standard of living to be enhanced by making whole world link together. Although there are some drawbacks of using the communicating devices in psychological, physical and societal effects, its beneficial is outweigh its drawbacks.
- The charts below show the percentage of wate used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 73
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 84
- The graph below gives information from a 22008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...solation is no-longer disturbing in the peoples relationship, people can easily communi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...and societal effects, its beneficial is outweigh its drawbacks.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249363867684 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.145038167939 0.155533422707 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.119592875318 0.0946595960268 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0330788804071 0.0501214627716 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0432569974555 0.0437548338989 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119592875318 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0508905852417 0.0403226058552 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.34700285176 2.80594681477 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0178117048346 0.0326793684256 55% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101781170483 0.0861772015684 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027989821883 0.021408717616 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0101781170483 0.011925033212 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2415.0 1933.35771543 125% => OK
No of words: 355.0 316.048096192 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.80281690141 6.12580529183 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.459154929577 0.374742101984 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.371830985915 0.28420135186 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.284507042254 0.203846283523 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.211267605634 0.137316102897 154% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34700285176 2.80594681477 119% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.56093040696 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.8310602402 60.7387585426 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8823529412 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8575597034 49.517814964 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.058823529 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 58.0654515327 49.1944974215 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.89655172414 1.69124875643 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39864861046 0.332605444948 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112325661798 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862246986411 0.0668466124924 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546431362868 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153242564304 0.148594505496 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158219320287 0.134430193775 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782782116449 0.0742795772207 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.38310819052 0.324371583561 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.118556757418 0.0638462369009 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270585410759 0.228012699653 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393268130084 0.058150111329 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.