Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people argue that too massive effort is spent to preserve the wildlife and birds. I strongly disagree with the idea and I would argue that protecting the existence of wildlife is also saving the earth where human are inhabiting in.
To begin with, it is obvious that wild animals play as indispensable role in biology balance which distributes our living environment. The lack of any species will lead to the loss of the balance which harms our lives. Thus, the reserves designing to protect endangered species are essential. One animal living in the wild is a link of a big chain that if one link is disappeared, the whole chain will be affected. For example, if panda is extinct, their habitat such as trees or tiny animals relying on them will be affected. The whole story will lead to the unbalance environment. As a result, effort should be made in protecting rare and endangered animals.
In addition, the main reason threatens the wild definitely is human activities in the economy, construction, and beauty sectors. Human should be responsible for destroying animals’ habitat and hunting rare animals. In fact, the conservation job would be much easier if human concern more about the environment instead of doing harmful activities to the wild because of profit. For example, illegal wildlife trafficking hunt elephant for its valuable ivory which can be sold with a high price in the shadow market. To prevent this illegal action, effort must be spent to stop this problem.
In conclusion, although some people would argue there is too much attention paid to preserving wild animals and birds, I strongly believe that wildlife and birds especially endangered species should be protected as much as possible because of their vital role in human’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | baonguyennhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | dinelmao | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-25 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- ZoosSome critics contend that keeping animals in zoos is inhumane and must be changed. They believe that zoos are unnatural and provide no real benefit to society besides providing entertainment at the expense of the animals involved. The truth is that zo 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 93
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74398529871 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537414965986 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3872227743 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222247953175 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673411628362 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068099915985 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151010665454 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703802051568 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.