In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It’s plain that there have been few opportunities of approach superior education for children living in the countryside in many developing nations. Many claim that bringing schools and teachers to such locations can probably tackle the issue whilst others are wedded to the view that technology will guarantee a better life for children living in deprived conditions. In this essay, I will discuss both these views before giving my own opinion.
On the one hand, the role of schools and teachers in heightening people’s intellect as well as developing economy as a whole is indisputable. Unlike advanced countries, children in rural areas have been confronting lacking qualified education which will likely equal the high rate of illiteracy. Hence, erecting more educational institutions staffed with high-calibered and well-trained teachers would acquire academic knowledge as well as social skills, all of which are catalyst for their comprehensive development at the early age. This contributes to forming would-be competent workforce, which helps rural communities escape from poverty through far-reaching changes in education.
On the other hand, without the help of technology, children in remote villages will have many difficulties in access to education. The geographical barriers will discourage them from attending class frequently, in turn impeding their studying process. Therefore, by equipping young children with online lessons or programmes, they can self-study at home rather than having to go to school or utterly hinging upon educators. Also, this is a good chance for them to familiarize themselves with online education – a state of the art educational mode.
In conclusion, I personally believe that schools and technology schools and technology are contributing factors which have reciprocal relationship promise disadvantaged children a better studying condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want, others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded Why people fail to benefit when they travel What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit 88
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 93
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they be punished? 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...countryside in many developing nations. Many claim that bringing schools and teachers to s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77580071174 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11925311545 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6803413703 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179403111937 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622647454428 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419131059196 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10242541914 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014899366793 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.