The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author asserts that the surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. Indisputably, welfare of people have great and foremost impact on peoples, irrespective of nation. Nevertheless, in order of get recognition at world’s level, rulers, artists, or scientists played an important ruler, without them welfare of people doesn’t have that much impact on other. Thus, I generally disagree with opinion that great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientist, but by general welfare of its people.
First of all, Rulers are the one’s who represent their nation at world’s level. I would like to point out that without rulers, its very hard to represent and get recognition at world’s level.Rulers bring policies from different nations in order to represent themselves at other nations. to illustrate, let us look at the example of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who represent its country like no one ever could be able to represents at world’s level. Because of his leadership and orator quality , now Iindia is able to make friends from all over the world and they are able to show their works at different levels.
Another compelling argument against speaker’s claim has to do with scientists. Without scientist’s work any nation couldn’t be able to thrive in their prosperity. Scientist re responsible for making distinguish development for their nation and their findings create lots of difference in other nations people mentality. For example, current Microsoft CEO, Satya nadella, able to increase his company market by around $240 million in 3 years of his tenure. He’s is from India and working in other country and everyone around the world know him now.
Furthermore, having general welfare of nation’s couldn’t bring ample opportunities. If, rulers are not present then who will bring policies and represent their nation and resolve lots of issues. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that rulers are ones who’s works provide great achievement to nation.
Additionally, welfare of nation’s people Maos plays a crucial role. This is true especially when it comes to behaving with other nations people and adapting other nations culture. In addition , welfare of people left their cultures significance in other nations. However, above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that great nation is represented by welfare of its people. Because without rulers, artist or scientist, we are not able to show our welfare at other nations people.
In conclusion, great nation is represented by the achievement of its rulers, artists, or scientist, but by the general welfare of its people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rulers
...d get recognition at world's level.Rulers bring policies from different nations i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... represent themselves at other nations. to illustrate, let us look at the example ...
^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...use of his leadership and orator quality , now Iindia is able to make friends from...
^^
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pting other nations culture. In addition , welfare of people left their cultures s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41704035874 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03119082627 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488789237668 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0823532408 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.818181818 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280945266858 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117014147097 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143344318535 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212199378356 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157053076962 0.0667264976115 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.