Modern technology has a great impact on environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Lifestyle has undergone a dramatic change in this modern era. Presently, people are more dependent on technology. However, technology has adverse effects on the environment. Therefore, a massive number of people ponder that living a simple life could be beneficial to solve this issue. On the other hand, others assert that technology could provide a treatment to this concern. Here, l would like to account with both the views with my own perception.
There are manifold points to support up the former view. First and foremost, simple lifestyle can be lucrative to control air pollution. To illustrate, adopting simple lifestyle encourages people to cover short journey by walk or by bicycle instead of using motorcars or bikes. Apart from this, people will not cut down trees for factories, industries etc. As a result, it will be helpful to prevent ecological hazards. What is more, people will avoid the use of pesticides and adopt the organic methods of farming under the presence of simple lifestyle. Thence, it could be fruitful for the environment.
Numerous points can be mentioned to support the latter view. Initially, technology can discover ecofriendly transport modes and energy sources to curtail environmental problems. Consequently, it will be helpful in controlling the environmental concerns. Moreover, technology can be used to establish recycling plants in order to recycle the waste material. Thus, it can play a pivotal role to save the environment. What is more, solar energy can be used to generate electricity to run machines etc. As a result, environmental issues can be prevented with the help of technology.
From my notion, every coin has its two aspects. Undeniably, adopting simple lifestyle will be beneficial for the environment. However, we cannot underestimate the power of technology as a remedial measure to the environmental concerns. Both approaches should be taken into consideration to control the environmental problems.
To recapitulate, technology is both boon and bane for the people and environment. Therefore, the people and government should take proactive steps to control the environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-15 | Sunzid_Ahmed | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | ahsan042 | 73 | view |
| 2017-11-15 | Manijot | 74 | view |
| 2015-06-09 | pratik_dkr1 | 73 | view |
- Do you think the significance of English language as an international languagewill be lost with globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation?What is your opinion 56
- Nowadays, majority of people are migrating to metrocites.what are the reasons behind this happening? Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this growing trend. 74
- Nowadays, majority of people are migrating to metrocites.what are the reasons behind this happening? Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this growing trend. 61
- Some people say that government should invest in trains and the subway system to prevent traffic congestion in large cities others however think that it should built wider roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 37
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 25
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. duplicated transition words, like:
What is more, people will avoid the use of pesticides and adopt the organic methods of farming under the presence of simple lifestyle.
What is more, solar energy can be used to generate electricity to run machines etc.
2. need to remove the pattern behind. have your own writing styles.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 335 350
No. of Characters: 1764 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.278 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.266 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.971 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.958 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.473 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.281 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.484 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... up the former view. First and foremost, simple lifestyle can be lucrative to co...
^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w. First and foremost, simple lifestyle can be lucrative to control air pollutio...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y by walk or by bicycle instead of using motorcars or bikes. Apart from this, peo...
^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecological hazards. What is more, people will avoid the use of pesticides and ado...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endly transport modes and energy sources to curtail environmental problems. Conse...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... help of technology. From my notion, every coin has its two aspects. Undeniab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, as a result, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45373134328 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09972943437 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546268656716 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2057803082 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.2692307692 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8846153846 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260353066621 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746830821168 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529384588563 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170143083384 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647763192528 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.44 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.