When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge.
Which of these points of view do you agree with most? Support your argument with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
Computers have become an integral part of our lives, and we can see them working to make things easier all around us. They have enabled us to make information sharing a lot easier and also helped us to become more organized at workplaces. Hence, I believe that computers have made us happier as we can accomplish much more within a limited time frame.
Information sharing has been made much easier due to the existence of computers. Computers enable access to emails, social networks and video sharing platforms, which easily allows us to send out and receive information. This has made learning easier and has also enabled us to find out what is happening around the world. For example, we are able to access and read global news through the internet wherever we are.
Handling tasks at our jobs have also become more organized as we can create, store and retrieve data with ease. The calculation and the storing of data can be done accurately by computers, allowing us to focus on solving bigger problems and not worry about the minor details which can be automated such as calculations and memorizing. This has also ensured that the work is done correctly and efficiently.
Some people argue that computers have made us less productive by providing us with ways to waste our time. I strongly believe that computers are not the reason for this, as they are a medium that allows us to achieve our means efficiently. How we use that medium depends entirely on us. It would be unwise to forego the use of computers which have made the human endeavor to simplify life possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | Primace | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | ajayaryanone | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 55
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 55
- Completing university education is thought by some to be thebest way to get a good job. On the other hand, people also saythat getting experience and developing soft skills is moreimportant.Choose which position you most agree with and discuss whyyou chos 72
- The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eve that computers have made us happier as we can accomplish much more within a li...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 20.9802955665 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76642335766 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5301948717 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7090138741 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188931272359 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724640440047 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612633449026 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122744277423 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823751590558 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.