Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
The importance of communication, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of dramatic change in communication in the last 10 years has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on society in recent times. It can be agreed that there are more positive impacts of modern communication methods. This essay will elaborate how communication has bring benefits to the way people communicate with each other and how communication is affecting our society and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how modern communication methods have bring positive impacts, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that thanks to Internet which now help people to connect with each other easily with their friends and family. Moreover, people can also operate and manage their work from numerous locations around the world. As an illustration, many large companies and individuals conduct their meetings through using video conferencing. Hence, modern communication tools have created ease and comfort in human life.
However, there remain some drawbacks that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of modern communication, but the most primary one is that less face to face meetings among people have caused a gap between many individuals. Furthermore, using these communication tools people can harm their bodies, for example, hearing problems. Thus, it is apparent why many people are not in favour of these modern communication methods.
In the view of outlined above, it can be concluded that the benefits of communication changing the way people communicate with each other are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change. 77
- Do you think the significance of English language as an international language will be lostwith globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation?What is your opinion? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior? Do you agree with it? 80
- What is the best invention of the last 100 years: computer, antibiotics, airplane? Explain why. 85
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...ay will elaborate how communication has bring benefits to the way people communicate ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...s how modern communication methods have bring positive impacts, but the most conspicu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t that thanks to Internet which now help people to connect with each other easily...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this communication' or 'these communications'?
Suggestion: this communication; these communications
...en many individuals. Furthermore, using these communication tools people can harm their bodies, for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46268656716 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96600250541 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6770824242 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173714706365 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700474790359 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771149617355 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113174672229 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889861458232 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.