Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Some the people believe that much of the information that they regard as truth finally become false, however, there are some knowledges that has not been disproved by contrary from very past to today. Thus, I partially agree with the argument.
Before looking into the informations which was deemed fact, but debunked currently, A theory of Copernicus who is eminent astrologist is one of the proper examples. Before Copernicus, a theory which assert that the universe is orbiting around the Earth which is the center of the universe which indicate that space moves around the Earth. It was most appreciated theory at the time that almost every scientist assumed it as true. However, Copernicus challenge the theory which was uncontroversial at the time. Due to his relentless effort and study and improved observing technology, Copernicus’s theory, which found out that the Earth orbit around the Sun like other planets, became true and admired as fact.
Moreover, once most of the european believe that they are only humanity in the world and there is deadend exist in the far east of their ocean. However, a pioneer Columbus who found new land which is now America. He changed the theory which was once esteemed as truth but now outdated. It is true that there are many great land except for the Europe. Columbus is one who disprove the wrong theory which had existed for long time.
On the otherhand, there are several informations that are still truth and going to be indisputable in the future, as well. Isac Newton, the most distinguished physiologist in the world has proved that every single thing in the Earth is pulled toward the center of it. He found it serendipically by observing an falling apple. It is still indispensible theory in any sphere of science and indisputable. Any of scientist have succeed in disproving it and it is also definited as a scientific law.
In summary, it is true that many of informations in the world actually turns out to be wrong. However, it does not demonstrate that every single theories are vulnerable that finally going to be disproved by opponents. Therefore, I partially agree with the statment that is given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | AAAA2222 | 83 | view |
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain. Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 50
- “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 50
- "The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony's inception ten years ago. Last year the symphony hired an internationally known conductor, who has been able to attract high-profile guest musicians to perfo 58
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants. "Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little i 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...at almost every scientist assumed it as true. However, Copernicus challenge the theo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Copernicus) must be used with a third-person verb: 'challenges'.
Suggestion: challenges
...assumed it as true. However, Copernicus challenge the theory which was uncontroversial at...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun land seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much great land', 'a good deal of great land'.
Suggestion: much great land; a good deal of great land
...now outdated. It is true that there are many great land except for the Europe. Columbus is one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...He found it serendipically by observing an falling apple. It is still indispensibl...
^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...and indisputable. Any of scientist have succeed in disproving it and it is also definit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, except for, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97260273973 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77372601644 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501369863014 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7510209315 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166205726634 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497086213428 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684919662488 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971132817889 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555018120603 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.