Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Everyone has an idea about many topics. There are two sides around the one’s idea which are positive and negative. In the other words, it is agreement and contradiction for an idea. Although, someone is agreed in any topic with us sounds good, if someone is sharing same direction with us we generally feel more comfortable and more courageous in the case of defending that idea. However, it is not beneficial every time as it looks. Contradictions could show us different perspectives that we cannot see in first.
First of all, take a look at the famous and impressive scientist in the history. Generally, their mutual feature is being refused in their initial career. For example, Galileo who had an opinion which has defended that the world is rounded not the flat. He has been refused and excluded from many community, foremost from the church. What was the effect of that much of refusal? He has insisted on to prove his idea and studied more and more relentlessly. Finally, even he has not been witness that his idea was right but, in the long run his idea has been proved. It means that people could learn more from people who have placed in the opposite side of themselves.
We cannot assert the contrary about the disagreement could cause stress. It is totally true and might affect the learning but it is not always prevailing. Learning is relative thing which depends on people. Some can be affected by disagreement negatively, some cannot be. Stress creates the pressure to justify one’s opinion but I do not think so it would affect the learning that much. It may cause overwhelm but people are enough equipped to overcome this feeling then, pursue to learn more and more. Placing in same direction usually brings people to back not to forward. Evaluating different sights are very invaluable thing to get conclusion in an issue. For this reason, I am being in the fully opposite direction with the claim which is given.
As a conclusion, contradiction opens our eyes to other possibilities then, convey us to learn and research about the other sides of medallion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-08 | iRohan | 58 | view |
2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
2019-10-30 | priit | 58 | view |
2019-10-12 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 58 | view |
2019-10-10 | vishucology | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 16
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; t 63
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Everyone has an idea about many topics. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectives that we cannot see in first. First of all, take a look at the famous ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the opposite side of themselves. We cannot assert the contrary about the ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion with the claim which is given. As a conclusion, contradiction opens our...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87150837989 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63372125048 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.113336521 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6666666667 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217452746147 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531846805015 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430697432855 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113446817503 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057336615781 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.