In the future, it is expected that there will be higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this positive or negative development?
It is agrued that there will be higher percentage of older citizens in various nations. From my point of view, this notion has both benefits and drawbacks with each person and each situation. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that the requirement of individuals has increased graduately, so higher proportion of older people is hugely dangerous for the nation development. Not only can lagre companies decreased dramatically their productivity, deteriorating the economic backgroung of their country, but also postgraduates will have lower opportunity to achieve in grate bunsiness. Furthermore, numerous companies will lack of employee which lead harmful affection for the nation improvement. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Chervet Lewin, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of adolesence in Europian countries where have higher proportion of older people. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has made a plenty of mistake and trouble in their career.
On the other hand, we can not nagate the importance of the older generations for the society. A lot of academic knowledge, valuable information and strength experience can be passed on by ther older who have more social abilities. Moreover, the young generations will be taught carefully to avoid to social-evil such as drugs, nicotein and other types of addicted, advantage influence will be led by this phenomenon.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay this statement have its own helpful and demerits approriate with each person and each situation, so government need to have clear plans to advance their citizens for the nation development.
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 39
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects shoul 56
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is agrued that there will be higher p...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 2, column 807, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mistake seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of mistakes'.
Suggestion: plenty of mistakes
... showed that nearly everyone has made a plenty of mistake and trouble in their career. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mistake and trouble in their career. On the other hand, we can not nagate the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uence will be led by this phenomenon. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41605839416 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99112474081 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3422277977 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228323687201 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820191983252 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631706532519 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128269036405 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623399065183 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.