Nowasays alarge amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advertisements are becoming more and more prevalent in everyday life as one can see an advert on all means of media. Therefore, a number of people request the government to forbid advertisements aimed at young children due to their severe impacts. From my personal perspective, I totally agree with this school of thought.
To begin with, many adverts are created with the inappropriate content to children to watch leading to the fact that children are spoiled greatly. It is obvious that the main purpose of advertisements is to exaggerate the quality and function of the products, so the producers always concentrate on the factors which support this purpose instead of concerning about the content of the advert. Children, especially teenagers, are at the age where they are sensitive to novel ideas and concepts hence they easily form exotic thought in their mind. For example, some teenage boys express their curiosity about pornographic contents without concerning its negative effects on their sentimental healthy as they expose to this kind of advert day by day.
Another reason is that young viewers are easily taken advantage of. As they are at small age, they do not have enough knowledge to differentiate the quality of the products or rarely take into consideration the function and practical value of those products. They seem to spare no expense to buy what they find interesting. Furthermore, children can be distracted from studying because of these adverts. They cannot resist the temptation to quit and almost try all ways to get these products without wondering whether they are useful or healthy.
In conclusion, I believe that advertisements can easily attract children as they are less able to understand the negative of the adverts. Therefore, advertising aimed at children should be prohibited to make sure children are raised well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-23 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | letcallmemit | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | tranthudiem | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison when relevant 78
- Some people say that with the new technology there is no need to develop handwriting skills anymore Others believe that it is still necessary to teach handwriting Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than the world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- Some people believe that air travel shoulf be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resource To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...t the temptation to quit and almost try all ways to get these products without wondering...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88417906672 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0298187659 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265334728046 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904743820686 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769932925961 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175246302667 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825195782992 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.