Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
There are some controversial ideas heating a debate over how to educate students. While some institutions compel 15-year-old children to absorb certain subjects, others demand their scholars to learn a wide range of subjects until graduating. From my point of view, I believe the merits of the latter cannot overshadow those of its counterpart.
Learning a wide array of knowledge plays a paramount role in broadening student’s capability of seeing the world from different aspects. This may act as prerequisite for teenager to integrate into harsh community with ease. While some people, who having limited insight of certain subjects, may struggle with problems out of their field, students with their extensive curriculum find handling obstacles straightforward due to their background knowledge. For instance, a student who can have not only certain knowledge but also experiences from extracurricular activities are more potentially succeed than its fellows.
While the redeeming features of holistic curriculum are widely acknowledged, it is unfair if those of one-subject concentration are ignored. youngsters who acquiring profound insights are superior to others in some extents. Instead of studying 13 compulsory subjects, they just have to what they yearn for and put more dedication to it. Thus, they have high chance to land a decent job and move up on career ladder. Furthermore, studying one subjects help them to save their valuable time for different stuff such as relaxation, entertaining,…. Therefore, the efficiency of their work is enhanced, and the knowledge they digest can be etched in your memory longer.
To sum up, although studying wide range of knowledge can have some positive impacts on both social skills and academic journey, a specialized subject would serve more useful purpose. So that I think that kind of teaching method should be implemented in order to optimize the outcome for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 73
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 84
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefit is in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Youngsters
... one-subject concentration are ignored. youngsters who acquiring profound insights are sup...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...t stuff such as relaxation, entertaining,…. Therefore, the efficiency of their wor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03838224499 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656666666667 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2242646993 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221294380758 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661612829218 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569549179415 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131368163143 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376020418052 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.