Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Art and culture have implicitly become an essential part of every nation around the globe, causing some level of public controversy. Whereas some people cast doubt on tremendous efforts for their proliferation and maintenance, I accede to those who believe in the substantial values they bring to both the population and the national culture.
On the one hand, there are several dissenting opinions against subsidising artistic and cultural activities. It is argued that governments have placed too much value on the preservation of art and culture while more viable and pivotal features should attract more attention such as the healthcare system, transportation infrastructure, human welfare, etc. Frankly speaking, people spontaneously opt for ignoring certain values if being unable to make ends meet or suffer from degraded medical conditions. Besides, fewer and fewer people are willing to pay a visit to museums and art galleries where antique and national artworks are on display thus the purpose they serve cannot be achieved. In Vietnam, for instance, the number of both local and international visitors making an excursion to art and culture exhibitions has decelerated, leaving those places unexposed to the target audiences and squandering an endless budget on maintenance.
On the other hand, my conviction is that the importance of traditional conventions and art should not be neglected. Culture and art are conspicuously accompanied by education. By conveying historical messages as well as the idea of contemporaneous artists, cultural participation provides locals with the opportunity to learn more about their own traditional and historical heritage. For example, from Thanh Giong folk story, Vietnamese now all learn how their ancestors went through various challenges and even sacrificed themselves for the independence of the country, which would contribute greatly to nurturing patriotism. Furthermore, taking art and culture are not only a display into consideration, tourists and locals can indulge in other activities to explore and commemorate traditional values such as cultural festivals, regional specialities, folk games, etc. For instance, myriad tourists are attracted to come and discover Lunar New Year in certain Asian countries every year, from which they grasp a great chance to experience stunning performances, and fireworks, and enjoy festival staples. By bringing and spreading precious memories in their homeland, visitors are attributed to the dissemination of Asian culture and conventions.
In conclusion, though there is opposition to the support of culture and art, I take the view that it is indispensable for both individuals and society as a whole to preserve and develop them.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, frankly, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63438256659 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14641433989 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607748184019 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2155382084 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.133333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332374885285 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104477743158 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046312741521 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197094146199 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305901753367 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.