Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While playing in teams like football or baseball is believed to be more significant, the rest of people argue that individual kinds of sports namely swimming or tennis is more important. In my opinion, it is such a variety of useful benefits that participants gain in each type of sports.
On the one hand, regarding attending in a team, there are the several advantages that each members receive. First and for most, it is inherent that teamwork skill has been accumulated gradually. The more games they play, the more experiences they gain. Should a team's performances are not good, teammate will know how to deal with problems. The way each person encourage and inspire others leads to either a deeper understanding or a close relationship among members. Secondly, it is such a range of different positions that players have had more chances to take part in and try their bests. For example, in football, junior soccer players are trained in all positions and then, they realize that which corner of a pitch they can take the good responsibility. Gradually, not only being the best player in his forte, but he also moves around actively when a coach gives an instruction.
On the other hand, individual performance in playing tennis or swimming is thought to be better due to following reasons. To begin with, it is the most effective way for participants to enhance their personal skills. Should they try to achieve a longer distance while swimming, they will identify whether they can do and which factors are needed to be improved. Therefore, they feel it easier to control either their performances or emotions and stress as well. Furthermore, players peak at the highest level quickly and fluently. Since do they not depend on any teammates, they solve a variety of problems which are less complex than playing in a team by themselves. Consequently, they can not only overcome a period of difficulty time easily but also achieve their desired rank efficiently.
In conclusion, every kind of sports both brings the number of merits and takes more much time to adapt no matter what it is. Besides, it is hard to decide which one is reasonable and more beneficial as choosing depends on each person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | ketan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ajendrapatel | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Nguyenhuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Jiny Ju | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Javzaa | 56 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 11
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The given diagram indicates information about how used glass bottles are recycled 95
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91978609626 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74265349404 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585561497326 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5060731431 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8421052632 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7894736842 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194380110449 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507324855635 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580133029648 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128431218455 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543165463083 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.